Mobile Version: mobile.mininggazette.com
RSS:
Houghton Weather Forecast, MI
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified Web
Summer Come UP 2009  Community News  Obituaries  Sports  CU Galleries  Blogs  Today's Frontpage  Local Classifieds  Jobs
Editorial

Prescription drug ad bill misguided

POSTED: August 6, 2009

Those annoying commercials warning about four-hour erections could be a thing of the past if a new bill introduced by Rep. James Moran, D-Va., sees its way through Congress. Moran's beef with the commercials stems from what he considers a problem of decency. Though, his proposal would probably be better off if he tried to take on prescription drug advertising as a whole, instead.

Even though it has become a common punch line, it's safe to say few people enjoy seeing commercials for drugs such as Viagra or Cialis in between their favorite shows. Moran's thinking is similar to that used to create the National Do Not Call Registry many years ago - find something that most people don't enjoy, and try and get rid of it. However, considering the shows that are on network television today, it's unlikely many people will complain about a minute-long commercial that suggests more than it shows. As far as morals go, the shows surrounding these male potency commercials are usually far more offensive than the commercials themselves.

Decency just isn't a big enough justification to see a reduction in these commercials. For something like this to even have a chance in passing, it would need to take on drug advertisements as a whole.

Last year, drug companies spent $4.8 billion marketing their products to potential recipients, which is still dwarfed by how much they spend advertising toward doctors. This scale of marketing - all for a product that should be able to sell based only on effectiveness - makes us a little uncomfortable. Prescribing medication is supposed to be a decision made between a patient and their doctor. Having a third party with an ulterior motive not only influences the process, but trivializes it.

Proposals limiting drug ads have been introduced before, but have seen little success. Ultimately, the prescription drug companies do have a First Amendment right to market their product. They are a business, and a business has the right to promote their goods. The nature of an enterprise doesn't restrict its ability to sell its product. The health care industry has a little too much influence in a doctor's decision making for our comfort, but ultimately they have the right.

While neither a bill outlawing drug ads or Moran's plan likely will pass, but they are still important because they make people think about how they're marketed the things that keep them healthy.

THE STATE NEWS (East Lansing), July 28

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-10 | Post a comment
Snowman
09-14-09 9:38 PM
However, let me add that in this case a four hour erection, rather than just a REQUIRED warning it is a subtle suggestive statement to it's effectiveness and Phizer recognizes that. Think about it!

Snowman
09-14-09 9:35 PM
I'm sorry but the REAL reason you have to put up with those statements is because they are called DISCLAIMERS". They a required by other laws that consumer advocate zealots past that force drug companys to tell you things like it may cause a four hour erection. So ya, go ahead mess with it somemore and an advertiser won't have any time left to tell the consumer something more important about their medications!

SportLABear
09-02-09 2:07 PM
ok. why does an "erection" get bleeped - it will happen again, but douche gets to stay in. Seems a bit prudish to me there editors! Grow up.

SportLABear
09-02-09 2:05 PM
I really have to agree with the overall idea of this purported bill. My family's personal beef with these ads is not just with the*********pills, but the feminine hygeine products, pads and the tons of ads geared toward the female consumer. As far as I've seen there are only 3 ads for RX*********aids for men, several more geared for the "nutritional supplement" arena, and the lone Trojan's commercial you see every once in a while. Women have innumerable ads for douche, sprays, KY "specialty gels", IUD's, contraceptives... the list goes on. So if Congress does take this up, then they should nix all of this stuff. I personally am tired of the lot of them.

bearofanation
08-14-09 3:28 PM
rabbitkiller, do you really kill rabbits?

Flashset
08-13-09 1:26 PM
I think all prescription drug ads should be banned - period (from tv, newspapers, magazines, etc).

YooperQuincy
08-07-09 11:35 AM
Those ads have no place during evening programing and sporting events when young children are watching. Parents should be allowed to discuss reproductive biology with their kids on their own time, not in the middle of a baseball game.

RabbitKiller
08-06-09 12:56 PM
funny how they can use the word in an editorial but it doesn't get past their censorship filter.

RabbitKiller
08-06-09 12:55 PM
v-i-a-g-r-a

RabbitKiller
08-06-09 12:54 PM
How come there's no news today about the armed robbery of the Walmart pharmacy in Houghton? Thieves made off with the entire stock of ****** and now the police are on the lookout for a band of hardened criminals.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Summer Come UP 2009  Community News  Obituaries  Sports  CU Galleries  Blogs  Today's Frontpage  Local Classifieds  Jobs