Time to take another look at 2nd amendment

To the editor:

The second amendment is ambiguous.

If you are pro-gun you can read it as giving us the right to own any type weapon without restriction.

If you are anti-gun you can interpret it to restrict weapons to a well regulated militia only.

When the founding fathers enacted the second amendment the weapons.

Available were muzzle loaders requiring about on minute to reload.

Did they envision a future when anyone could acquire a weapon that could kill twenty people in one minute?