I was disappointed to read your editorial of Feb 8 in which you stated the criteria for letters to the editor. Perhaps I misunderstand, but it appears you will not be printing letters that pertain to national/international issues.

Part of a healthy community is an open exchange of ideas regarding events – local, statewide, national and international.

I feel that this policy contributes to something that is already a crisis in this country – the division of our community into factions. People are only talking to people who think like they do. Social media, where many people are getting their information, makes it very easy to just delete someone who disagrees with you. If our newspapers censor discussions of national issues, where will those discussions take place? Where can we get opposing views?

I suggest that you reconsider your decision. I understand you have to censor certain aspects of letters, but I think this is a step too far.

Elizabeth Whelan

Calumet

Editor’s response: Thank you, Elizabeth, for sharing your perspective. In our editorial about letters to the editor, published Feb. 8, we were specific about soliciting opinions and reactions to local happenings and issues.

We believe that members of this community are experts on this community. Who knows the Copper Country better than its residents?

We don’t discourage letter-writing about state, national or international topics, but most often, we see greater value in advancing a local debate on an issue that affects us in our home. That’s our role as a local, community-focused newspaper.

We appreciate your letter.